Core Optical Technologies, LLC v. ADVA Optical Networking SE et al
Plaintiff: Core Optical Technologies, LLC
Defendant: ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2020cv01463
Filed: August 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
2 Judge: James V Selna
3 Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2020 Filing 29 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 15 days following decision on Motion to Dismiss in Core Optical v. Juniper Networks and Core Optical v. Nokia re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stockstill, Raymond)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting #25 Non-Resident Attorney John S Holley APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE, designating Raymond W Stockstill as local counsel. (jp)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting #24 Non-Resident Attorney Christina A Ondrick APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE, designating Raymond W Stockstill as local counsel. (jp)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting #23 Non-Resident Attorney Blair M Jacobs APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE, designating Raymond W Stockstill as local counsel. (jp)
September 10, 2020 Filing 25 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney John S. Holley to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28023893) filed by defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stockstill, Raymond)
September 10, 2020 Filing 24 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christina A. Ondrick to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28023693) filed by defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stockstill, Raymond)
September 10, 2020 Filing 23 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Blair M. Jacobs to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28023421) filed by defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc., ADVA Optical Networking SE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stockstill, Raymond)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE JOINT REPORT FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. #21 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to the order setting the scheduling conference in this matter (Dkt. #21 ), the Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report (the "Joint Report") shall be filed on or before October 9, 2020. To serve judicial and party efficiency and to expedite review, counsel in this action are ordered to confer with the parties in the following related actions: 8:19-cv-2189-JAK-RAO (Juniper); 8:19-cv-2190-JAK-RAO (Nokia); and 8:20-cv-1468-JAK-RAO (Cisco) in preparing the Joint Report. An identical Joint Report shall be filed in each action no later than October 9, 2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (eth) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/9/2020. (vv)
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/9/2020. (vv)
September 2, 2020 Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, served on 09/02/20. (Hadley, Lawrence)
September 2, 2020 Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc. answer now due 10/2/2020; ADVA Optical Networking SE answer now due 10/2/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendants ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc.; ADVA Optical Networking SE.(Attorney Raymond W Stockstill added to party ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Raymond W Stockstill added to party ADVA Optical Networking SE(pty:dft))(Stockstill, Raymond)
August 20, 2020 Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, re Intradistrict Transfer - Clerical Error (G-73) - optional html form, #8 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #5 , Report on Filing of Patent/Trademark Action (Initial Notification)(AO 120) #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #9 served on Aug 12th 2020. (Hadley, Lawrence)
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (droj)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:19-cv-02189 JAK(RAOx). Case transferred from Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:20-cv-01463 JAK(RAOx). Signed by Judge John A. Kronstadt (rn)
August 11, 2020 Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc.. (es)
August 7, 2020 Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence)
August 7, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #7 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap)
August 7, 2020 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant ADVA Optical Networking SE. (ghap)
August 7, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
August 7, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap)
August 7, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:20-cv-1463 JVS (ADSx). (ghap)
August 6, 2020 Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence)
August 6, 2020 Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence)
August 6, 2020 Filing 5 Notice and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, (Hadley, Lawrence)
August 6, 2020 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence)
August 6, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. NOTICE OF RELATED CASES UNDER LOCAL RULE 83-1.3 Related Case(s): 8:19-cv-02190-JAK-RAO; 8:19-cv-2189-JAK-RAO (Hadley, Lawrence)
August 6, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence)
August 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27530908 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-5, #2 Exhibit 6-10, #3 Exhibit 11, #4 Exhibit 12, #5 Exhibit 13, #6 Exhibit 14) (Attorney Lawrence M Hadley added to party Core Optical Technologies, LLC(pty:pla))(Hadley, Lawrence)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Core Optical Technologies, LLC v. ADVA Optical Networking SE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Core Optical Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Lawrence M Hadley
Represented By: Lawrence Robert LaPorte
Represented By: Stephen Eric Underwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc.
Represented By: Christina A Ondrick
Represented By: John S. Holley
Represented By: Raymond W Stockstill
Represented By: Blair M. Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADVA Optical Networking SE
Represented By: Christina A Ondrick
Represented By: John S. Holley
Represented By: Raymond W Stockstill
Represented By: Blair M. Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?