Isabel Ramos v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
| Isabel Ramos |
| AT&T Mobility Services LLC, Brian Jacobson, AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., AT and T Mobility Services LLC, Does 1 through 25, inclusive and AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc. |
| 8:2020cv01477 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 47
Receipt of Acknowledgment of documents by Superior Court of California County of Orange, case no. 30-02019-01099812-CU-WT-CJC. (lom)
|
|
Filing 46
TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court - Justice Center. Case number: 30-02019-01099812-CU-WT-CJC. (jp)
|
|
Filing 45
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. #31 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: the Court GRANTS the Motion. The case is remanded to the Superior Court of California for the County of Orange, Case No. 30-2019-01114431-CU-OE-CJC. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing 44
REPLY To Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. (Feghali, Allen)
|
|
Filing 43
Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to County of Orange #31 filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc.. (Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 42
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PAGA COMPLAINT (Doc. #26 ) AND ADVANCING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. #31 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File anAmended PAGA Complaint (Doc. 26) is CONTINUED to 1/7/2022 at 10:30 AM., and the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 31) is ADVANCED to 11/19/2021 at 10:30 AM. (jp)
|
|
Filing 41
RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Amend PAGA Complaint #26 filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. (Feghali, Allen)
|
|
Filing 40
Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Amend PAGA Complaint #26 filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc.. (Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 39
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Motions in Limine (Doc. #38 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the Deadline to file Motions in Limine, currently set for 10/15/2021, is continued until 1/28/2022. (jp)
|
|
Filing 38
STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Motions in Limine filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Brian Jacobson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 37
ORDER CONTINUING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ADR #36 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that (1) The Deadline to Conduct Settlement Proceedings, currently set for 9/10/2021, is CONTINUED to 2/4/2022 and (2) The Final Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for 11/12/2021, is CONTINUED to 2/25/2022 at 10:30 AM. (jp)
|
|
Filing 36
STIPULATION to Continue Final Trial Setting Conference & Deadline to Complete ADR from 11/12/21 & 9/10/21 to After Court's Rulings on Pending Motions filed by Defendant AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Brian Jacobson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 35
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Isabel Ramos' Complaint filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Brian Jacobson. Motion set for hearing on 1/14/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration Dipanwita Amar, #3 Declaration Brian Jacobson, #4 Declaration April S. Cook, #5 Declaration Donna Norwood-Cooper, #6 Declaration Armando Palomino, #7 Declaration Michael Poole, #8 Declaration Tonya Scott, #9 Declaration Bradley Troutfelt, #10 Separate Statement of Uncontroverted Facts, #11 Request for Judicial Notice, #12 Proposed Order) (Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 34
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos, (Gunther, Brett)
|
|
Filing 33
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to County of Orange #31 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. In accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Documents, it is hereby ORDERED that the document is accepted as filed. However, counsel must consult the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #32 and file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than **July 29, 2021.** Failure to do so may result in the Motion being STRICKEN. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 32
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos #31 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
|
|
Filing 31
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to County of Orange filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. Motion set for hearing on 1/7/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF ALLEN FEGHALI IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REMAND, #2 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND) (Gunther, Brett)
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER RE: REQUEST TO DISMISS FEHA AND WRONGFUL TERMINATION CAUSES OF ACTION #29 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that Plaintiff's claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall not be permitted to revive or assert any of these claims at any point up to and including trial. Brian Jacobson is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (jp)
|
|
Filing 29
STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Brian Jacobson filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST TO DISMISS FEHA AND WRONGFUL TERMINATION CAUSES OF ACTION)(Gunther, Brett)
|
|
Filing 28
DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT by Judge Josephine L. Staton re Plaintiff's EX PARTE APPLICATION #27 . ***There is no emergency (other than of Plaintiff's own making) that justifies moving what is already on calendar as a regularly-noticed motion to the head of the line through the filing of an ex parte application. Plaintiff is ordered to review this Courts procedures page regarding disfavored applications to advance hearing dates. See Judges Procedures Page, available at https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-josephine-lstaton***. (jp)
|
|
Filing 27
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Hearing ADVANCE THE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Amend PAGA Complaint #26 , filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF ALLEN FEGHALI IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF ISABEL RAMOS'S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ADVANCE THE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order) (Feghali, Allen)
|
|
Filing 26
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Amend PAGA Complaint filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. Motion set for hearing on 10/22/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Allen Feghali in Support of Plaintiff Isabel Ramos's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Proposed Order) (Feghali, Allen)
|
|
Filing 25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott re Stipulation for Protective Order. #24 (es)
|
|
Filing 24
STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Brian Jacobson.(Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 23
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Enzo Dalgat Nabiev counsel for Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. Adding Enzo Nabiev as counsel of record for Isabel Ramos for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. (Nabiev, Enzo)
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #21 . The following error(s) was/were found: Blank document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
|
|
Filing 21
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Enzo Dalgat Nabiev counsel for Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. Adding Enzo Dalgat Nabiev as counsel of record for Isabel Ramos for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Enzo Nabiev. (Attorney Enzo Dalgat Nabiev added to party Isabel Ramos(pty:pla))(Nabiev, Enzo)
|
|
Filing 20
CIVIL TRIAL ORDER for cases assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (mku)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than September 10, 2021. (mku)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83-1.4 filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Does, Brian Jacobson. (Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTES (In Chambers) SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing 10/2/2020, is VACATED and the following schedule is set. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/12/2021 at 10:30 AM. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
|
Filing 16
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial Plaintiff Estimates 20-27 Days; Defendant Estimates 4-5 Days, filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Does, Brian Jacobson.. (Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Allen Victor Feghali on behalf of Plaintiff Isabel Ramos (Attorney Allen Victor Feghali added to party Isabel Ramos(pty:pla))(Feghali, Allen)
|
|
Filing 13
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Christopher Lee Garcia counsel for Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. Christopher L. Garcia is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. (Garcia, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 12
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brett Michael Gunther counsel for Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. Adding Brett M. Gunther as counsel of record for Isabel Ramos for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. (Attorney Brett Michael Gunther added to party Isabel Ramos(pty:pla))(Gunther, Brett)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE Corrected Notice and Certificate of Requirement to Give Notice of Removal filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Does, Brian Jacobson. (Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Caption of attached document has incorrect case number. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE and Certificate of Compliance of Requirement to Give Notice of Removal filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Does, Brian Jacobson. (Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 10/2/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Statement #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): An incorrect event was selected for Document No. 2. The correct event is Corporate Disclosure Statement. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (lh)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Does, Brian Jacobson. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Isabel Ramos. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/23/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendants AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Brian Jacobson. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/28/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh)
|
|
Filing 2
STATEMENT Interested Parties filed by Defendants AT&T Mobility Services LLC, AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., Brian Jacobson re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . (Amar, Dipanwita)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior, case number 30-2019-01099812 Receipt No: ACACDC-27562047 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Brian Jacobson, AT&T Mobility Services LLC, AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration Dipanwita Amar, #3 Declaration Jackie A. Begue) (Attorney Dipanwita Deb Amar added to party AT&T Mobility Services LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Dipanwita Deb Amar added to party AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Dipanwita Deb Amar added to party Brian Jacobson(pty:dft))(Amar, Dipanwita)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
