Ian Kerr v. Bottling Group, LLC
Plaintiff: Ian Kerr
Defendant: Bottling Group, LLC, Bottling Group, LLC doing business as Pepsi Beverages Company and Does 1 to 50
Case Number: 8:2020cv01490
Filed: August 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2020 Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant Bottling Group, LLC.. (Berry, James)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-131) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., this case is transferred from Judge David O. Carter to the calendar of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:20-cv-01490 SB-KESx. (rrp)
August 19, 2020 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Bottling Group, LLC, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 , Reassign Case - Self-Recusal - pursuant to GO 19-03 (CV-52), #7 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #9 Proof Of Service Of: Notice To Parties Re ADR Program; Order To Reassign Case To Judge Carter; Initial Standing Order Following Assignment Of Civil Case To Judge Carter, And Order Setting Scheduling Conference served on 8/19/2020. (Berry, James)
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 10/19/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kd)
August 17, 2020 Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge James V. Selna. Case transferred from Judge James V. Selna to the calendar of Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 8:20-cv-01490 DOC(KESx). (rn)
August 13, 2020 Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
August 12, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
August 12, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh)
August 11, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Bottling Group, LLC, Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Ian Kerr. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/15/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
August 11, 2020 NON-CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Bottling Group, LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh)
August 11, 2020 Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Bottling Group, LLC, identifying PepsiCo, Inc., parent of Bottling Group, LLC; Pepsi Bottling Holdings, Inc., Member of Bottling Group, LLC; Bottling Group Holdings, LLC, Member of Bottling Group, LLC; Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc., Member of Bottling Group Holdings, LLC. (Berry, James)
August 11, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Bottling Group, LLC. (Berry, James)
August 11, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01148247-CU-OE-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-27585430 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Bottling Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint & Summons, #2 State Court Answer, #3 Appendix of Copies of State Court Pleadings and Process Served on Defendant; Defendants State Court Answer) (Attorney James H Berry, Jr added to party Bottling Group, LLC(pty:dft))(Berry, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ian Kerr v. Bottling Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ian Kerr
Represented By: Jonathan J Moon
Represented By: Dilip M Vithlani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bottling Group, LLC
Represented By: James H Berry, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bottling Group, LLC doing business as Pepsi Beverages Company
Represented By: James H Berry, Jr
Represented By: Kathryn LaQuay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?