Virginia Helen Locke et al v. The United States of America
Plaintiff: Flecicia Deon Heise and Virginia Helen Locke
Defendant: The United States of America
Case Number: 8:2020cv01502
Filed: August 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2020 Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd)
August 20, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
August 20, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil)
August 18, 2020 Filing 3 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $400 into the registry of the Court from Virginia Helen Locke. Re: Notice Re: Discrepancies with Lodging of Complaint (CV-47) #2 . Receipt number SA016725. (jgu)
August 13, 2020 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Flecicia Deon Heise and Virginia Helen Locke. (jtil)
August 13, 2020 Filing 4 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Virginia Helen Locke and Flecicia Deon Heise, against Defendant The United States of America. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Filing fee $ 400 Paid.) Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil)
August 13, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH LODGING OF COMPLAINT mailed to Plaintiff Flecicia Deon Heise, Virginia Helen Locke. Upon submission of your complaint, the following discrepancy was found: You have submitted a personal check. Please be advised that personal checks are not accepted. Your check will be returned to you by our Fiscal Department. Please send a cashiers check or money order instead. Be sure to reference the civil case number on your payment. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your your action will be dismissed. If your fee waiver request or payment is received within THIRTY DAYS, judges will be assigned to your case. You may return your fee waiver request or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Lodged Complaint 1 (Attachments: #1 Lodged Complaint, #2 CV71, #3 CV30) (jtil)
August 13, 2020 Filing 1 LODGED COMPLAINT sought to be filed by Plaintiffs Flecicia Deon Heise and Virginia Helen Locke. (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Virginia Helen Locke et al v. The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Flecicia Deon Heise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Virginia Helen Locke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?