Luis Marquez v. Trico Trading Corporation et al
| Luis Marquez |
| Multiservices H & R, Inc, DOES 1-10, Trico Trading Corporation and Multiservices H and R, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv01541 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT, REMOVING CASE FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD, AND FILING OF DISMISSAL by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On 10/8/2020, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement (doc. #14 ), indicating that the case has fully settled. Based thereon, the Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case stayed pending final settlement. Further ordered that this action is removed from the Courts active caseload. The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal no later than 12/7/2020. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Vacate All Currently Set Dates filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Defendant Trico Trading Corporation served on 9/24/2020, answer due 10/15/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Glenn Nishizu in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Plaintiff Multiservices H and R, Inc. served on 9/18/2020, answer due 10/9/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Francois Dibsy the manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquezto Order to Show Cause, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration of Dennis Price)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (mku) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
Filing 8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Multiservices H and R, Inc., Trico Trading Corporation. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27710091 - Fee: $400, filed by Brian Whitaker Luis Marquez. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Luis Marquez(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
