Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. FedChex Recovery LLC
| Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection |
| FedChex Recovery, LLC |
| 8:2020cv01698 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Petitioner Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Assae-Bille, Elisabeth) |
Filing 18
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
|
Filing 17
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
| Filing 16 This action has been reassigned to the Honorable John W. Holcomb, United States District Judge. Judge Holcomb is located in Courtroom 2, on the 2nd Floor of the George E. Brown, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501. Additional information regarding Judge Holcomb's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, re Order, #13 , Chief District Judge Transferring Case, #14 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #10 served on September 29, September 30, and September 17, 2020, respectively. (Assae-Bille, Elisabeth) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING #12 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the supplemental briefing of the Petitioner is now due on 11/6/2020; and that Respondent's reply is now due within twenty-one (21) days of the date of Petitioners briefing. (jp)
|
| Filing 12 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Supplemental Briefing as Ordered on Sept. 8, 2020 filed by plaintiff Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hartmann, Leanne) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-126) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge John W. Holcomb, this case is transferred from Judge Josephine L. Staton to the calendar of Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:20-cv-01698 JWH-KESx. (rrp)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 8:20-cv-01698-JLS (KESx). The previous case number, 8:20-mc-00010, is hereby terminated. (et) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REQUESTING Supplemental Briefing (Doc. #1 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton:CFPB must file its supplemental brief within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. FedChex must then file its response no later than twenty-one (21) days after CFPB's brief is filed. Neither brief may exceed ten (10) pages. If the Court decides to schedule oral argument on this issue, it will notify the parties. (jp)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: granting #8 Non-Resident Attorney Jehan A Patterson APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, designating Leanne E Hartmann as local counsel. (jp)
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jehan A. Patterson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Not Required for US Government Attorney) filed by plaintiff Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Designation as Local Counsel, #2 Proposed Order) (Hartmann, Leanne) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: granting #6 Non-Resident Attorney Elisabeth V Assae-Bille APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, designating Leanne E Hartmann as local counsel. (jp)
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Elisabeth Vanessa Assae-Bille to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Not Required for US Government Attorney) filed by Plaintiff Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Leanne E. Hartmann in Support of Designation as Local Counsel, #2 Proposed Order) (Hartmann, Leanne) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney E. Vanessa Assae-Bille. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Proposed Order to Show Cause re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Show Cause)(Hartmann, Leanne) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. (Hartmann, Leanne) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Petition to Enforce, #2 Declaration of E. Vanessa Assae-Bille, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D) (Attorney Leanne E Hartmann added to party Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection(pty:pet))(Hartmann, Leanne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. FedChex Recovery LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FedChex Recovery, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection | |
| Represented By: | Jehan A. Patterson |
| Represented By: | Leanne E. Hartmann |
| Represented By: | Elisabeth V Assae-Bille |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
