Wisteria Properties LLC v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
| Wisteria Properties LLC |
| DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Defendant Ohio Security Insurance Company, a New Hampshire corporation |
| 8:2020cv01708 |
| September 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| James V Selna |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ohio Security Insurance Company, a New Hampshire corporation, identifying Wisteria Properties, LLC, Ohio Security Insurance Company. (Do, Jessica) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #14 DEFENDANT OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANYS ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by Defendant Ohio Security Insurance Company, a New Hampshire corporation.(Attorney Jessica Bich Anh Do added to party Ohio Security Insurance Company, a New Hampshire corporation(pty:dft))(Do, Jessica) |
Filing 17
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 11/30/2020 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 11/23/2020. (lb)
|
| Filing 16 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Wisteria Properties LLC, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Lancaster, Michael) |
| Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANT Wisteria Properties LLC amending Amended Complaint/Petition #14 , filed by Plaintiff Wisteria Properties LLC(Lancaster, Michael) |
| Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANT Wisteria Properties LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Wisteria Properties LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to First Amended Complaint)(Lancaster, Michael) |
| Filing 13 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28021969 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Wisteria Properties LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement SUMMONS, #3 Supplement NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES, #4 Supplement PROOF OF SERVICE)(Lancaster, Michael) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 18, 2020 AND FOR DISMISSAL OF LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY WITHOUT PREJUDICE #10 by Judge James V. Selna (lc) Modified on 9/10/2020 (lc).
|
| Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Russum, Blake) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra- district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:20-cv-01708 JVS (JDEx). (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #4 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Wisteria Properties LLC in Orange County Superior Court on 5/26/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 served on September 4, 2020. (Do, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Blake J Russum on behalf of Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Attorney Blake J Russum added to party Liberty Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Russum, Blake) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, identifying Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc.; LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc.; LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc.; Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.; Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.. (Do, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Do, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 2020-81144542 Receipt No: ACACDC-27938470 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jessica Do in support of Removal, #2 Declaration of Matthew Kennedy in support of Removal, #3 Declaration of Jessica Do of Filing of Removal in State Court) (Attorney Jessica Bich Anh Do added to party Liberty Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Do, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
