Xavier Nunez v. Nevell Group, Inc. et al
| Xavier Nunez |
| NEVELL GROUP, INC. and Does 1-100, inclusive |
| 8:2020cv01753 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Trisha Kathleen Monesi counsel for Plaintiff Xavier Nunez. Joseph Hakakian is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Xavier Nunez. (Monesi, Trisha) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Trisha Kathleen Monesi counsel for Plaintiff Xavier Nunez. Adding Trisha Monesi as counsel of record for Plaintiff for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Xavier Nunez. (Attorney Trisha Kathleen Monesi added to party Xavier Nunez(pty:pla))(Monesi, Trisha) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on December 3, 2020. (cw) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 24 Civil Cover Sheet, 25 Corporate Disclosure Statement, 26 Notice of Interested Parties, 27 Ntc. of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings are attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Nevell Group, Inc., Of Defendant's Notice to Adverse Party and to Superior Court of Removal of Action to Federal Court served on September 15, 2020. (Dauscher, Scott) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Xavier Nunez, upon Defendant Nevell Group, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 6/11/2015, answer due 7/2/2015. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Amber S Healy, Attorney for defendant on behalf Nevell Group, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT I ROA 17) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to THIRD Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Nevell Group, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/4/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT G)(ghap) Modified on 9/16/2020 (ghap). |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, inclusive, Nevell Group, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Xavier Nunez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/9/2015 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap) Modified on 9/16/2020 (ghap). |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, inclusive, Nevell Group, Inc., Nevell Group Inc.-San Diego Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Xavier Nunez. FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/20/2015 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Nevell Group, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON7/31/2015 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, inculsive, Nevell Group, Inc. amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Xavier Nunez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/15/2016 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, inclusive, Nevell Group, Inc. amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Xavier Nunez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/14/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT F) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to SECOND Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Nevell Group, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/26/2016 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT E)(ghap) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2015-00783269 Receipt No: BCACDC-28075349 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant NEVELL GROUP, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - Class Action Complaint, #2 Ex. B - First Amended Complaint, #3 Ex. C - Defendant's Answer to Unverified First Amended Complaint, #4 Ex. D - Conformed Second Amended Complaint, #5 Ex. E - Answer to Plaintiff_s Unverified Second Amended Complaint, #6 Ex. F - Third Amended Complaint, #7 Ex. G - DEFENDANT NEVELL GROUP, INC.'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S UNVERIFIED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, #8 Ex. H - Register of Actions Print Out, #9 Ex I, Vol.1, ROA 3 to 111, #10 Ex I, Vol.2, ROA 113 to 171, #11 Ex I, Vol.3, ROA 172, Part 1, #12 Ex I, Vol.3, ROA 172, Part 2, #13 Ex I, Vol.3, ROA 172, Part 3, #14 Ex I, Vol.4, ROA 173 to 226, #15 Ex I, Vol.5, ROA 230 to 260, #16 Ex I, Vol.6, ROA 262 to 343, #17 Ex I, Vol.7, ROA 344, Part 1, #18 Ex I, Vol.7, ROA 344, Part 2, #19 Ex I, Vol.7, ROA 344, Part 3, #20 Ex I, Vol.7, ROA 344, Part 4, #21 Ex I, Vol.7, ROA 344, Part 5, #22 Ex I, Vol.8, ROA 345 to 354, #23 Ex I, Vol.9, ROA 356 to 478, #24 Civil Cover Sheet, #25 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #26 Notice of Interested Parties, #27 Ntc. of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings) (Attorney Scott K Dauscher added to party NEVELL GROUP, INC.(pty:dft))(Dauscher, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
