Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc. et al v. Alltrade Tools LLC
| Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc. and Shinn Fu Corporation |
| Alltrade Tools LLC |
| Diane Faber |
| 8:2020cv01767 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V Selna |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
ORDER OF DISMISSAL #34 by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the claims by Shinn Fu against Alltrade and the counterclaims by ALLTRADE against Shinn Fu are each hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees to any party. (es)
|
| Filing 34 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Denkenberger, John) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE #32 by Judge James V. Selna: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Extend Deadline is GRANTED. The 45-day deadline set forth in this Court's Order of Dismissal Upon Settlement of Case (Dkt. No. 29) is hereby extended by three weeks. The parties have until July 8, 2021, to finalize and consummate their settlement agreement. (es)
|
| Filing 32 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion to Reopen Action if Settlement is not Consummated filed by Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McMahon, Brian) |
| Filing 31 MEDIATION REPORT filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Diane Faber: A mediation did not take place because the case settled before the session occurred.(Faber, Diane) |
| Filing 30 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Order of Dismissal) (es) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT OF CASE #28 by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS ORDERED that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its entirety without prejudice to the right, upon good cause being shown within 45 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
|
| Filing 28 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Settlement filed by Plaintiff Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Denkenberger, John) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for November 17, 2021.(Faber, Diane) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Diane Faber has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 25 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim #21 filed by Plaintiff Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation.(Denkenberger, John) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE SCHEDULING DATES by Judge James V. Selna: The Court has read and considered the parties Rule 26(f) Report and sets the following dates: Jury Trial July 5, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. Final PreTrial Conference June 20, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. Discovery Cut-off November 24, 2021. Expert Discovery Cut-off February 22, 2022. Law and Motion Cut-off May 16, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The Court orders that any settlement discussions shall be completed not later than March 31, 2022. [See document for details and deadlines.] The Scheduling Conference set for January 11, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED. (es)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL SETTING DATES; PREPARATION FOR TRIAL; AND GOVERNING ATTORNEY AND PARTY CONDUCT AT TRIAL before Judge James V. Selna. (See Document for Details and Deadlines) (lb)
|
| Filing 22 STATUS REPORT on Behalf of All Parties filed by Plaintiff Shinn Fu Corporation. (McMahon, Brian) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by Defendant Alltrade Tools LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D)(Anderson, Gary) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER APPROVING THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; CONDUCT RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #19 by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint is extended from December 14, 2020 to December 28, 2020, and IT IS ALSO ORDERED that the deadline for conducting the Rule 26(f) Conference is continued until January 4, 2021. (lom)
|
| Filing 19 Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Alltrade Tools LLC answer now due 12/28/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Alltrade Tools LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Gary) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER APPROVING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; CONDUCT RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, #17 by Judge James V. Selna. Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint is extended to 12/12/2020. The Rule 26(f) Conference is continued until 12/14/2020; and the Scheduling Conference is continued to 1/11/2021 at 10:00 a.m. (es)
|
| Filing 17 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Alltrade Tools LLC answer now due 12/12/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Alltrade Tools LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Alltrade Tools LLC answer now due 11/12/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Alltrade Tools LLC.(Anderson, Gary) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Gary M Anderson counsel for Defendant Alltrade Tools LLC. Adding Gary M. Anderson as counsel of record for Alltrade Tools LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Alltrade Tools LLC. (Attorney Gary M Anderson added to party Alltrade Tools LLC(pty:dft))(Anderson, Gary) |
|
Filing 14
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 11/30/2020 at 10:00 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 11/23/2020. (lb)
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation, upon Defendant Alltrade Tools LLC served on 9/22/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Robert J. Ellis, Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hankin, Marc) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting #10 Non-Resident Attorney John D. Denkenberger APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc.; Shinn Fu Corporation, designating Marc E. Hankin as local counsel. (es)
|
| Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney John D. Denkenberger to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28136122) filed by Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order Granting Application) (Hankin, Marc) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Alltrade Tools LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney John D Denkenberger. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation. (Hankin, Marc) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation (Hankin, Marc) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation. (Hankin, Marc) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation. (Hankin, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 09/16/2020, receipt number 28113538), filed by Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc., Shinn Fu Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5) (Attorney Marc E Hankin added to party Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Marc E Hankin added to party Shinn Fu Corporation(pty:pla))(Hankin, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
