Kathleen B. Latham v. Lee Hecht Harrison LLC et al
| Kathleen B. Latham |
| Lee Hecht Harrison LLC, Does 1 through 100, inclusive and Lee Hecht Harrison, LLC |
| 8:2020cv01769 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 12/14/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kd)
|
| Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Lee Hecht Harrison, LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Declaration #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #5 , Declaration #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice (Other) #6 served on September 16, 2020. (Hernandez, Steve) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:20-cv-01769-DOC-JDE. (rrp)
|
| Filing 9 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Kathleen B. Latham.. (Thomas, Mark) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Class Action Complaint, filed by Defendant Lee Hecht Harrison, LLC. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/16/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO DECLARATION #2 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Lee Hecht Harrison, LLC amending Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Kathleen B. Latham. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/11/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO DECLARATION #2 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Lee Hecht Harrison, LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Kathleen B. Latham. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/11/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO DECLARATION #2 ) (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. section 1446(d) filed by Defendant Lee Hecht Harrison LLC. (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Lee Hecht Harrison LLC, identifying Adecco USA, Inc.. (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Lee Hecht Harrison LLC. (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Shannon Schmid re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Lee Hecht Harrison LLC. (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Ryan Estes re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Lee Hecht Harrison LLC. (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01142377-CU-OE-CXC Receipt No: ACACDC-28114785 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Lee Hecht Harrison LLC. (Attorney Steve L Hernandez added to party Lee Hecht Harrison LLC(pty:dft))(Hernandez, Steve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
