Hortencia Jaimes v. Hyatt Corporation
Hortencia Jaimes |
Hyatt Corporation a Delaware corporation doing business as Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive |
8:2020cv01811 |
September 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
James V Selna |
Josephine L Staton |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. #11 , 11-1) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order (Dkt. 11, 11-1) is DENIED without prejudice to the parties submitted a new stipulation and proposed protective order (see document for further details). (hr) |
Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by defendant Hyatt Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Freedman, David) |
Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Hyatt Corporation.. (Freedman, David) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 12/4/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Hyatt Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 9/21/2020. (Freedman, David) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The case initiating documents were incorrectly filed as attachments. Please utilize CM/ECF resources such as the search tool to locate the appropriate events for filing. No further action is required unless directed by the Court. (jtil) |
Filing 5 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:20-cv-01811-JLS-JDEx. (jgu) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:20-cv-01811 JVS (JDEx). (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Hortencia Jaimes in Orange County Superior Court on 8/12/2020, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Hyatt Corporation in Orange County Superior Court on 9/15/2020, attached as Exhibit 4.(jtil) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior, case number 30-2020-01154898-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-28147605 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Hyatt Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Case Cover Sheet state court, #4 Answer to Complaint, #5 Civil Cover Sheet CV-71, #6 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney David G Freedman added to party Hyatt Corporation(pty:dft))(Freedman, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.