Reyes Construction, Inc. v. D. P. Industries, Inc.
| Reyes Construction, Inc. |
| D. P. Industries, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 8:2020cv01837 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| John D Early |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Miller Act |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1346 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 1/15/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 21
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Scheduling Conference, previously scheduled before Judge Josephine L. Staton is vacated. This Court will issue its Order Setting Scheduling Conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk RE: Motion to Consolidate filed 11/6/2020 #16 . The document is stricken. (gk) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Consolidate Cases, as to 2:20-cv-07916, #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Lacking statement re conference of counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
|
Filing 18
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:20-cv-07916 AB(AGRx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge John D. Early and Judge Josephine L. Staton to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:20-cv-01837 AB(AGRx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 16 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS ON 11/12/2020, SEE DOCKET NO. 20] NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Consolidate Cases, as to 2:20-cv-07916, filed by Plaintiff Reyes Construction, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 3/19/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Kintzele, Jonathan) Modified on 11/12/2020 (gk). |
|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 12/18/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant D. P. Industries, Inc..(Landers, Luke) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to D. P. Industries, Inc. answer now due 10/2/2020,, STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 10/09/20 filed by Defendant D. P. Industries, Inc..(Landers, Luke) |
| Filing 12 (Landers, Luke) |
| Filing 11 (Landers, Luke) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Reyes Construction, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:20-cv-07916 (Kintzele, Jonathan) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:20-cv-01837 JLS (JDEx). (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Reyes Construction, Inc. in Orange County Superior Court on 8/13/2020, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing to Adverse Parties filed by Defendant D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corportion. To Reyes Construction, Inc., Plaintiff (Turner, Glenn) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corportion. D. P. Industries (Plaintiff) vs. Reyes Construction, Inc. (Defendant) Related Case(s): 2:20-CV-07916-SK (Turner, Glenn) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Lis Pendens filed by Defendant D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corportion. (Turner, Glenn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corportion. (Turner, Glenn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court - Central Justice Center, case number 30-2020-01155234-CU-BC-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-28185555 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corportion. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint (Reyes Construction), #2 Exhibit 2 - Federal Court Complaint (D. P. Industries), #3 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Related Cases (Reyes Construction)) (Attorney Glenn E Turner, III added to party D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corportion (pty:dft))(Turner, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
