James Rutherford v. Marshalls of CA, LLC, et al
| James Rutherford |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive, MARSHALLS OF CA, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, ROIC SANTA ANA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;, ROIC Santa Ana, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and Marshalls of CA, LLC |
| 8:2020cv01928 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement of entire case filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
Filing 17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Marshalls of CA, LLC identifying The TJX Companies, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Anderson, Eden) |
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to ROIC Santa Ana, LLC answer now due 12/3/2020, filed by Defendant ROIC Santa Ana, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Craig D McMahon added to party ROIC Santa Ana, LLC(pty:dft))(McMahon, Craig) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Marshalls of CA, LLC.(Attorney Eden Edwards Anderson added to party Marshalls of CA, LLC(pty:dft))(Anderson, Eden) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Marshalls of CA, LLC served on 10/15/2020, answer due 11/5/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant ROIC Santa Ana, LLC served on 10/13/2020, answer due 11/3/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (mku) |
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant ROIC Santa Ana, LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Marshalls of CA, LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff James Rutherford, (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28408072 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
