Judith L. Pottroff v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
| Judith L. Pottroff |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 to 30 |
| Judith L Pottroff |
| 8:2020cv01970 |
| October 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:20-cv-02142 MCS (SHKx). (lh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA County of San Bernardino, case number CIVDS2000997 Receipt No: ACACDC-28492737 - Fee: $400. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet - Costco, #6 Declaration Notice of Interested Parties - Costo, #7 Declaration Demand for Jury Trial - Costco) (Attorney Kristi Blackwell added to party Costco Wholesale Corporation(pty:bkmov))(Blackwell, Kristi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
