CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc. v. GHC Systems Inc. et al
| CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc. |
| Jared and Alana Inc., Beauty Plus Salon Inc., Lovely Skin, LLC, Lala Daisy LLC, GHC Systems Inc., Saloncentric, Inc., Wayne Grund, Beauty Care Choices, State Beauty Supply | RDA Pro Mart, L'Oreal USA, Inc. and Jared and Alana Inc. doing business as Skin Care by Alana |
| 8:2020cv01981 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| James V Selna |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR ALL DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO JANUARY 15, 2021 AND TO CONTINUE RULE 26(F) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO FEBRUARY 22, 2021 #18 by Judge James V. Selna. [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 1/15/2021 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Byron, Timothy) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc., upon Defendant GHC Systems Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/23/2020, answer due 12/14/2020; Jared and Alana Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/23/2020, answer due 12/14/2020; L'Oreal USA, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/23/2020, answer due 12/14/2020; Lala Daisy LLC acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/23/2020, answer due 12/14/2020; Lovely Skin, LLC acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/23/2020, answer due 12/14/2020; Saloncentric, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/23/2020, answer due 12/14/2020; State Beauty Supply | RDA Pro Mart acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/23/2020, answer due 12/14/2020. Acknowledgment of Service signed by George D. Moustakas, Counsel. (Byron, Timothy) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc. pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) Without Prejudice as to Wayne Grund. (Byron, Timothy) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Beauty Care Choices answer now due 12/11/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Byron, Timothy) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Beauty Plus Salon Inc. answer now due 12/11/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Byron, Timothy) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc., upon Defendant Beauty Plus Salon Inc. served on 10/30/2020, answer due 11/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mark Raphan - Managing Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Byron, Timothy) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc., upon Defendant Beauty Care Choices served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Pearl Gomez - Stylist in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Byron, Timothy) |
|
Filing 11
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 1/11/2021 at 10:00 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 1/4/2021. (lb)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Beauty Care Choices, Beauty Plus Salon Inc., GHC Systems Inc., Wayne Grund, Jared and Alana Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., Lala Daisy LLC, Lovely Skin, LLC, Saloncentric, Inc., and State Beauty Supply RDA Pro Mart. (jtil) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc.. (Raphael, Jordan) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc. (Raphael, Jordan) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE of Certificate of Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc. (Raphael, Jordan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc.. (Raphael, Jordan) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc.. (Raphael, Jordan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28531873 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex. C to Complaint, #4 Exhibit Ex. D to Complaint, #5 Exhibit Ex. E to Complaint, #6 Exhibit Ex. F to Complaint, #7 Exhibit Ex. G to Complaint, #8 Exhibit Ex. H to Complaint, #9 Exhibit Ex. I to Complaint, #10 Exhibit Ex. J to Complaint) (Attorney Jordan Philip Raphael added to party CR Keefe Enterprises, Inc.(pty:pla))(Raphael, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
