Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc. et al v. Kathy A. Baran et al
| Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc. and Mohammad Khalid |
| Chad Wolf, Kathy A. Baran, Kenneth Cuccinelli and William Barr |
| 8:2020cv02032 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc., Mohammad Khalid. (Telfer, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA,,, #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc., Mohammad Khalid, upon Defendant Kathy A. Baran served on 11/2/2020, answer due 12/28/2020; William Barr served on 10/29/2020, answer due 12/28/2020; Kenneth Cuccinelli served on 11/3/2020, answer due 12/28/2020; Chad Wolf served on 11/3/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C Torres. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to K Lusby. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Telfer, David) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Kathy A. Baran, William Barr, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Chad Wolf. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:20-cv-02032 DOC (DFMx). (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc., Mohammad Khalid. (Telfer, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc., Mohammad Khalid, (Telfer, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc., Mohammad Khalid. (Telfer, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28630408 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc., Mohammad Khalid. (Attorney David M Telfer added to party Islamic Society of Clemson, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney David M Telfer added to party Mohammad Khalid(pty:pla))(Telfer, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
