James Rutherford v. Sear Cheng et al
| JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual and James Rutherford |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive, SEAR CHENG, an individual, JOHN VAN LE and NGOC DIEP THI NGUYEN, individually and as the settlors and trustees of THE LE-NGUYEN FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 26, 2006, Does 1-10, inclusive, Sear Cheng, John Van Le and Ngoc Diep Thi Nguyen |
| 8:2020cv02095 |
| October 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant John Van Le(as the settlors and trustees of The Le-Nguyen Family Trust Dated June 26, 2006) served on 12/12/2020, answer due 1/4/2021; John Van Le(individually) served on 12/12/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Sear Cheng served on 12/2/2020, answer due 12/23/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Ngoc Diep Thi Nguyen(individually) served on 11/30/2020, answer due 12/21/2020; Ngoc Diep Thi Nguyen(as the settlors and trustees of The Le-Nguyen Family Trust Dated June 26, 2006) served on 11/30/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sear Cheng. (car) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants John Van Le(as the settlors and trustees of The Le-Nguyen Family Trust Dated June 26, 2006), John Van Le(individually), Ngoc Diep Thi Nguyen(individually), Ngoc Diep Thi Nguyen(as the settlors and trustees of The Le-Nguyen Family Trust Dated June 26, 2006). (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28775730 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
