Suneeta Persaud v. Optum Services, Inc. et al
| Suneeta Persaud |
| Optum Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 8:2020cv02103 |
| October 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(iii) filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc..(Wahlander, Michael) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sharde Thomas Skahan counsel for Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. Adding Sharde T. Skahan as counsel of record for Optum Services, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Attorney Sharde Thomas Skahan added to party Optum Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Skahan, Sharde) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael Anderson Wahlander on behalf of Defendant Optum Services, Inc. (Attorney Michael Anderson Wahlander added to party Optum Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Wahlander, Michael) |
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Granting Stipulation to Submit All Claims to Arbitration and Stay Action (Dkt. #10 ). SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Arbitration filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Winters, Mason) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Compliance filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Winters, Mason) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on January 7, 2021. (cw) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/29/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Optum Services, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Suneeta Persaud. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/31/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Mason R. Winters re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Winters, Mason) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Susan A. Weedman re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Winters, Mason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc., identifying Optum Inc., United HealthCare Services, Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Winters, Mason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Winters, Mason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01158083-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-28791662 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Complaint and related documents, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Defendant's Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Mason R Winters added to party Optum Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Winters, Mason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
