Duc Huynh Pham v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Mr. Duc Huynh Pham and Duc Huynh Pham |
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
8:2020cv02117 |
November 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen L Stevenson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER NOTIFYING PARTIES OF STAY AND ORDERING DEFENDANT TO NOTIFY PARTIES AND COURT OF THE DATE THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY RESUMES OPERATIONS by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. On April 17, 2020, Order 20-074 of the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Central District of California STAYED this case and directed that the stay shall remain in effect until one of the following occurs: (see document for further details). (hr) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson for all further proceedings. Please use the case number SACV20-2117 KS on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attorney Stacy Wiesbrock added to party Commissioner of Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Wiesbrock, Stacy) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Duc Huynh Pham, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 11/9/2020, answer due 3/9/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F DelaRosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Emily Sase. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (see document for details) (hr) |
Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Duc Huynh Pham. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Duc Huynh Pham. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Duc Huynh Pham, (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Duc Huynh Pham. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28835331 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Duc Huynh Pham. (Attorney Troy Dana Monge added to party Duc Huynh Pham(pty:pla))(Monge, Troy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.