Ally Bank v. Saeed Temori et al
| Ally Bank |
| American National Red Cross, The Salvation Army, Saeed Temori, American Cancer Society, Inc and Age Well Senior Services, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv02315 |
| December 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #11 as to Defendant The Salvation Army. (jp) |
| Filing 28 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #11 as to Defendant Saeed Temori. (jp) |
| Filing 27 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #11 as to Defendant American Cancer Society, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 26 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #11 as to Defendant Age Well Senior Services, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 25 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #11 as to Defendant American National Red Cross. (jp) |
| Filing 24 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 23 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 22 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 21 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 20 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Requests #14 , #15 , #16 #17 , and #18 . The following error(s) was found: (1) The date and signature line must be left blank. (2) Please indicate as to "FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT" right after SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION". The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jp) |
| Filing 18 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Ally Bank Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Melamed, Samuel) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank, identifying Ally Financial Inc.. (Melamed, Samuel) |
| Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Age Well Senior Services, Inc., American Cancer Society, Inc, American National Red Cross, Saeed Temori, The Salvation Army amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank(Melamed, Samuel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Melamed, Samuel) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Complaint #1 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. In accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Documents, it is hereby ORDERED that the document is accepted as filed. However, counsel must consult the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #7 and file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than **December 14, 2020.** Failure to do so may result in sanctions and/or the action being DISMISSED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Age Well Senior Services, Inc., American Cancer Society, Inc, American National Red Cross, Saeed Temori, The Salvation Army. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Wraight, Marquis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29416402 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Ally Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G to Complaint) (Attorney Marquis Ian Wraight added to party Ally Bank(pty:pla))(Wraight, Marquis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
