Securities and Exchange Commission v. Justin Robert King et al
||January 19, 2021
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 18, 2021
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT AGAINST AGAINST DEFENDANT JUSTIN ROBERT KING AND RELIEF DEFENDANT SHANNON LEIGH KING by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on March 15, 2021 at 1:30 p.m., SKing and JKing shall appear befo re this Court to show cause why an order of civil contempt should not be issued and, at that time. Any opposition papers shall be filed and served no later than March 1, 2021 and any reply papers shall be filed and served no later than March 8, 2 021. In addition to the service requirements under this Court's Local Rules, both the SEC and JKing and SKing shall provide the Court and each other with courtesy copies, via email, of all papers filed by no later than 5:00 p.m. PST on the date the papers are due. JKing and SKing shall advise the Court of any subsequent efforts to cure the acts of noncompliance with the Preliminary Injunction alleged by the SEC. (es)
|January 19, 2021
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND APPOINTMENT OF A PERMANENT RECEIVER by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the SEC's Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no bond shall be required in connection with the appointment of the permanent receiver. [See document for details.] (es)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?