Steve Lopez v. Target Corporation, et al
Plaintiff: Steve Lopez
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION, Does 1 to 50 inclusive and Target General Merchandise, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2020cv02407
Filed: December 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: James V Selna
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE SCHEDULING DATES by Judge James V. Selna: The Court has read and considered the parties Rule 26(f) Report and sets the following dates: Jury Trial August 16, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. Final PreTrial Conference August 1, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. Discovery Cut-off April 28, 2022. Expert Discovery Cut-off May 18, 2022. Law and Motion Cut-off June 27, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The Court orders that any settlement discussions shall be completed not later than January 31, 2022. [See document for further details and deadlines.] The Scheduling Conference set for February 8, 2021 at 11:30 a.m. is VACATED. (es)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL SETTING DATES; PREPARATION FOR TRIAL; AND GOVERNING ATTORNEY AND PARTY CONDUCT AT TRIAL before Judge James V. Selna. (See Document for Details and Deadlines) (lb)
February 1, 2021 Filing 12 JOINT REPORT OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26(f) REPORT of JOINT REPORT OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26(f) filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Hahn, Adrienne)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 2/8/2021 at 11:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 2/1/2021. (lb)
December 28, 2020 Filing 10 ANSWER to Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Target Corporation Target Corporation.(Hahn, Adrienne)
December 28, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE OF INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA filed by Defendant Target Corporation Target Corporation. (Hahn, Adrienne)
December 28, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES JUDGES filed by Defendant Target Corporation Target Corporation. (Hahn, Adrienne)
December 28, 2020 Filing 7 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
December 23, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
December 23, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa)
December 22, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Target General Merchandise, Inc., Does, filed by plaintiff Steve Lopez. (filed in state court 10/15/20, submitted as document 1, p. 9) (esa)
December 22, 2020 COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Steve Lopez, upon Defendant Target General Merchandise, Inc. served on 10/21/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Processby service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, p. 27) (esa)
December 22, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Target Corporation; Party Target General Merchandise, Inc. terminated, filed by plaintiff Steve Lopez. (filed in state court 11/13/20, submitted as document 1, p. 30)(esa)
December 22, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE filed by Defendant Target Corporation TARGET CORPORATION. NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT (Hahn, Adrienne)
December 22, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Target Corporation TARGET CORPORATION, (Hahn, Adrienne)
December 22, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Hahn, Adrienne)
December 22, 2020 Filing 1 * NOTICE OF REMOVAL * filed as COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29660437 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Attorney Adrienne R Hahn added to party TARGET CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Hahn, Adrienne) Modified on 12/23/2020 (esa).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steve Lopez v. Target Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Represented By: Adrienne R Hahn
Represented By: Adam Zamost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 50 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target General Merchandise, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Lopez
Represented By: Elan Zektser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?