Jesus Elena Garcia v. Target Corporation et al
| Jesus Elena Garcia |
| TARGET CORPORATION and Does 1 to 10 |
| 8:2020cv02410 |
| December 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| James V Selna |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER #13 by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. NOTE: Changes Made by the Court.* See document for details. (es)
|
|
Filing 15
[IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE SCHEDULING DATES by Judge James V. Selna: The Court has read and considered the parties Rule 26(f) Report and sets the following dates:Jury Trial May 31, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. Final PreTrial Conference May 16, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. Discovery Cut-off March 31, 2022. Expert Discovery Cut-off April 20, 2022. Law and Motion Cut-off April 11, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The Court orders that any settlement discussions shall be completed not later than January 31, 2022. [See document for further details and deadlines.] The Scheduling Conference set for February 8, 2021 at 11:30 a.m. is VACATED. (es)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL SETTING DATES; PREPARATION FOR TRIAL; AND GOVERNING ATTORNEY AND PARTY CONDUCT AT TRIAL before Judge James V. Selna. (See Document for Details and Deadlines) (lb)
|
| Filing 13 First STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Target Corporation Target Corporation.(Hahn, Adrienne) |
| Filing 12 STATUS REPORT JOINT_REPORT_OF_COUNSEL filed by Plaintiff Jesus Elena Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Dial, Stephen) |
|
Filing 11
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 2/8/2021 at 11:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 2/1/2021. (lb)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA filed by Defendant Target Corporation Target Corporation. (Hahn, Adrienne) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES JUDGES filed by Defendant Target Corporation Target Corporation. (Hahn, Adrienne) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Target Corporation Target Corporation.(Hahn, Adrienne) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Target Corporation, filed by Plaintiff Jesus Elena Garcia. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/16/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE filed by Defendant Target Corporation TARGET CORPORATION. NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT (Hahn, Adrienne) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Target Corporation TARGET CORPORATION, (Hahn, Adrienne) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Hahn, Adrienne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2020-01160531-CU-PO-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-29663255 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Target Corporation TARGET CORPORATION. (Attorney Adrienne R Hahn added to party TARGET CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Hahn, Adrienne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
