Poupak Barekat v. Kathy Lee et al
| POUPAK BAREKAT, an individual, and Poupak Barekat |
| Does 1- 10, Inclusive, KBH INVESTMENT COMPANY, a partnership, KATHY LEE, an individual, Does 1-10, inclusive, KBH Investment Company and Kathy Lee |
| 8:2020cv02420 |
| December 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter. In light of the Default By Clerk #15 entered on 2/18/2021, the Court sets a hearing for Order to Show Cause Re Default Judgment for 3/22/2021 at 8:30 a.m. If a Motion for Default Judgment is filed before 3/18/2021, the hearing on the Order to Show Cause will be discharged, and no appearances will be necessary on 3/22/2021. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY.
|
| Filing 15 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Kathy Lee an individual (twdb) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Entry of Default against Defendant Kathy Lee filed by Plaintiff Poupak Barekat. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Entry of Default, #2 Exhibit Proof Of Service) (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Poupak Barekat, upon Defendant Kathy Lee served on 1/19/2021, answer due 2/9/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Poupak Barekat, upon Defendant KBH Investment Company served on 1/26/2021, answer due 2/16/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant KBH Investment Company. (lh) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kathy Lee. (lh) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re: PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff POUPAK BAREKAT, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff POUPAK BAREKAT, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff POUPAK BAREKAT, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff POUPAK BAREKAT, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29700349 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff POUPAK BAREKAT, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party POUPAK BAREKAT, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
