Hal Marshall Sears v. Erica Wilson
Hal Marshall Sears |
Erica Wilson and DOES 1-10 inclusive |
8:2020mc00002 |
March 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 8:20-cv-00452 JLS (ADSx). The previous case number, 8:20-mc-00002, is hereby terminated. (jtil) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Erica Wilson, identifying Erica Wilson, Hal Marshall Sears, The Vanderpool Law Firm and Palmieri Tyler Weiner Wilhem & Waldron, LLP. (Tovar, Heather) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Erica Wilson. (Tovar, Heather) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01128260 Receipt No: ACACDC-25591967 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Erica Wilson. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint) (Attorney Heather A Tovar added to party Erica Wilson(pty:dft))(Tovar, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.