Roy Davis Gash v. Roland J Jensen, et al
| Roy Davis Gash |
| ROLAND J. JENSEN, Trustee, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Roland J. Jensen and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv00008 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE by Judge David O. Carter: The Court, having been notified by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled re Notice of Settlement #22 , hereby orders this action DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court hereby orders ALL proceedings in the case VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for 60 days to vacate this order and reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been consummated. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Settlement Of The Entire Case filed by Plaintiffs Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David) |
| Filing 21 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Not Held) before Judge David O. Carter. Case called. Court and confer. The Scheduling Conference is not held. Counsel notify the Court that the case has settled. Counsel are ordered to file a Notice of Settlement no later than 8/26/2021. Court Reporter: Court Smart. (et) |
| Filing 20 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court re-sets the time for the in-person Scheduling Conference from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on AUGUST 23, 2021. All persons, parties, clients, and individuals with settlement authority, are ordered to be present for this hearing. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kdu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3 Days, filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash.. (Wakefield, David) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/9/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 8/23/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
|
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Roland J. Jensen, identifying No other interested party. (Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Roland J. Jensen.(Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Roland J. Jensen(pty:dft))(Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 15 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court continues the Order to Show response deadline to May 19, 2021. Counsel is ordered to correct the deficency as listed in docket entry #14 . IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Roland J. Jensen, Trustee #12 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Proof of Service is lacking required information. Service Requirement re substituted service upon an individual is missing. The proof of service does not indicate whether service was made by FRCP or CCP. Substituted service is not complete until 10 days after the mailing of the documents to the party(ies), which would be 5/13/21. (twdb) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gashto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #11 (Wakefield, David) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Roland J. Jensen filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Wakefield In Support of Default) (Wakefield, David) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ( Show Cause Response due by 5/11/2021.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash, upon Defendant Roland J. Jensen served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon ROLAND J. JENSEN, Trustee in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Wakefield, David) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ( Show Cause Response due by 4/13/2021.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Roland J. Jensen. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash, identifying ROLAND J. JENSEN, Trustee. (Wakefield, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29870223 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Civil Complaint) (Attorney David C Wakefield added to party Roy Davis Gash(pty:pla))(Wakefield, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
