Brian Horowitz v. Toolots, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brian Horowitz, -
Defendant: Toolots, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2021cv00021
Filed: January 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2021 Filing 26 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 attachment) (twdb)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE. re: Notice of Settlement #24 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
May 24, 2021 Filing 24 NOTICE of Settlement by all parties filed by Defendant Toolots, Inc.. (Green, Andrew)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 6/7/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kd)
March 16, 2021 Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Toolots, Inc., identifying having no parent corporation or publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock. (Green, Andrew)
March 16, 2021 Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Toolots, Inc..(Green, Andrew)
March 2, 2021 Filing 20 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Toolots, Inc. answer now due 3/16/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Toolots, Inc..(Green, Andrew)
February 16, 2021 Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Toolots, Inc. answer now due 3/2/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Toolots, Inc..(Attorney Andrew Scott Green added to party Toolots, Inc.(pty:dft))(Green, Andrew)
February 1, 2021 Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jason Fu in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. Amended Proof of Service [w Affidavit of Due Diligence] (Forsythe, Marc)
January 28, 2021 Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz, upon Defendant Toolots, Inc. served on 1/26/2021, answer due 2/16/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jason Fu in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Forsythe, Marc)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Darrell W. Gibby APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Brian Horowitz Plaintiff, designating Marc C. Forsythe as local counsel. (twdb)
January 11, 2021 Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Toolots, Inc. (twdb)
January 8, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Order to Appear Pro Hac Vice re APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Darrell W. Gibby to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Brian Horowitz (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-29948215) #13 (Forsythe, Marc)
January 8, 2021 Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Darrell W. Gibby to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Brian Horowitz (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-29948215) filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz. (Forsythe, Marc)
January 8, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz, (Forsythe, Marc)
January 8, 2021 Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz. (Forsythe, Marc)
January 8, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil)
January 8, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil)
January 8, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Darrell W. Gibby. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil)
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
January 8, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
January 8, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil)
January 6, 2021 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Brian Horowitz. (Forsythe, Marc)
January 6, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz. (Forsythe, Marc)
January 6, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz. (Forsythe, Marc)
January 6, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29900045 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E) (Attorney Marc C Forsythe added to party Brian Horowitz(pty:pla))(Forsythe, Marc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brian Horowitz v. Toolots, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Horowitz, -
Represented By: Marc C Forsythe
Represented By: Darrell W. Gibby
Represented By: Marc C. Forsythe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toolots, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Scott Green
Represented By: Jason T Yu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?