Antonio Fernandez v. Caywood Realty, Inc., et al
| Antonio Fernandez |
| Zu-Hsiung Hsiao and Caywood Realty, Inc., |
| 8:2021cv00039 |
| January 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Cormac J. Carney: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. The Court further orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. re: Notice of Settlement #14 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, upon Defendant Zu-Hsiung Hsiao served on 1/22/2021, answer due 2/12/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, upon Defendant Caywood Realty, Inc., served on 1/22/2021, answer due 2/12/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Zu-Hsiung Hsiao in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandezto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Cormac J. Carney: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ( Show Cause Response due by 1/15/2021.) (twdb)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (cw)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Caywood Realty, Inc., Zu-Hsiung Hsiao. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Fernandez Antonio. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Fernandez Antonio, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Fernandez Antonio. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29960062 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Fernandez Antonio. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Fernandez Antonio (pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
