Jeffrey E. Brandlin v. S.J. Distributors Inc.
Plaintiff: Jeffrey E Brandlin
Defendant: S.J. Distributors Inc., a California corporation and S.J. Distributors Inc.
Case Number: 8:2021cv00132
Filed: January 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been reassigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Any matters previously referred are transferred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. New Case Number 2:21-cv-00723 DMG (AFMx). (jtil)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
January 22, 2021 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant S.J. Distributors Inc. (jtil)
January 22, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
January 22, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil)
January 21, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey E Brandlin. Related Case(s): 8:19-cv-01174-SVW-KES (Moldo, Byron)
January 21, 2021 Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey E Brandlin, identifying S.J. Distributors, Inc., a California corporation, Securities and Exchange Commission, Richard Vu Nguyen, a/k/a Nguyen Thanh Vu, NTV Financial Group, Inc.. (Moldo, Byron)
January 21, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey E Brandlin., Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey E Brandlin. (Moldo, Byron)
January 21, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey E Brandlin. (Moldo, Byron)
January 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30171532 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey E Brandlin. (Attorney Byron Z Moldo added to party Jeffrey E Brandlin(pty:pla))(Moldo, Byron)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeffrey E. Brandlin v. S.J. Distributors Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey E Brandlin
Represented By: Byron Z Moldo
Represented By: Byron Z. Moldo
Represented By: Sonia Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S.J. Distributors Inc., a California corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S.J. Distributors Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?