United States of America v. John C. Dalton, IV et al
| United States of America |
| Matthew J. Dalton, John C. Dalton, IV and John C. Dalton, V |
| 8:2021cv00140 |
| January 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| James V Selna |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. § 7402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, Granting #21 Non-Resident Attorney John T. Ruskusky APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant John C. Dalton, IV, John C. Dalton, V, and Matthew Dalton, designating Shahzad A. Malik as local counsel. (es)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, Granting #22 Non-Resident Attorney David M. Pattee APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant John C. Dalton, IV, John C. Dalton, V, and Matthew Dalton, designating Shahzad A. Malik as local counsel. (es)
|
| Filing 22 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David M. Pattee to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants John C. Dalton, V, John C. Dalton, IV, Matthew J. Dalton (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-30904420) filed by Defendant John C. Dalton, V, John C. Dalton, IV, Matthew J. Dalton. (Malik, Shahzad) |
| Filing 21 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney John T. Ruskusky to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants John C. Dalton, V, John C. Dalton, IV, Matthew J. Dalton (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-30904407) filed by Defendant John C. Dalton, V, John C. Dalton, IV, Matthew J. Dalton. (Malik, Shahzad) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Shahzad A Malik on behalf of Defendants John C. Dalton, V, John C. Dalton, IV, Matthew J. Dalton (Attorney Shahzad A Malik added to party John C. Dalton, V(pty:dft), Attorney Shahzad A Malik added to party John C. Dalton, IV(pty:dft), Attorney Shahzad A Malik added to party Matthew J. Dalton(pty:dft))(Malik, Shahzad) |
|
Filing 19
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 04/19/2021 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 04/12/2021 (kdu)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:20-cv-02001-JVS-KES. Case referred from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for DISCOVERY. The case number will now read as follows: 8:21-cv-00140-JVS-KES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (rrp)
|
| Filing 17 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff United States of America. upon Matthew J. Dalton waiver sent by Plaintiff on 1/22/2021, answer due 3/23/2021. Waiver of Service signed by John T. Ruskusky. (Phillips, Harris) |
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff United States of America. upon John C. Dalton, V waiver sent by Plaintiff on 1/22/2021, answer due 3/23/2021. Waiver of Service signed by John T. Ruskusky. (Phillips, Harris) |
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff United States of America. upon John C. Dalton, IV waiver sent by Plaintiff on 1/22/2021, answer due 3/23/2021. Waiver of Service signed by John T. Ruskusky. (Phillips, Harris) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Matthew J. Dalton. (lh) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant John C. Dalton, V. (lh) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant John C. Dalton, IV. (lh) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Gregory Mokodean on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Mokodean, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Harris Phillips on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Attorney Harris Phillips added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Phillips, Harris) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Gavin L Greene counsel for Plaintiff United States of America. Adding Gavin L. Greene as counsel of record for United States of America for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attorney Gavin L Greene added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Greene, Gavin) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff United States of America. (Mokodean, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff United States of America. (Mokodean, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff United States of America. (Mokodean, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Mokodean, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by plaintiff United States of America. (Attorney Gregory Mokodean added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Mokodean, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
