Hui Peng v. Dong Li
| Hui Peng |
| Dong Li |
| 8:2021cv00228 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby continues the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case #18 currently set for April 23, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. to August 6, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. Counsel is reminded to refer to the list of CLOSED motion dates on Judge Statons Procedures and Schedules page prior to filing future motions.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 19
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (Defendant Dong Li's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Hui Peng's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof) filed by Defendant Dong Li. Motion set for hearing on 4/23/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bowman, Ashley)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant Dong li to Respond to Complaint #16 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that Defendant Dong Li shall file a response to the Complaint on or before 3/22/2021. (jp)
|
|
Filing 16
Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to March 22, 2021 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Dong Li. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Joint Stipulation Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint)(Bowman, Ashley)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 4/30/2021 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hui Peng, identifying Plaintiff, Defendant, Leoch International Technology Limited, Catherine Holdings International Company Limited, Leoch Battery Corporation. (Buxbaum, David)
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Plaintiffs Motion to Remand #10 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. In accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Documents, it is hereby ORDERED that the document is accepted as filed. However, counsel must consult the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #12 and file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than **February 23, 2021.** Failure to do so may result in the Motion being STRICKEN. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange, Central Justice Center filed by Plaintiff Hui Peng #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. (3) The event to be use is: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties - under Category - "NOTICES". In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
|
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby continues the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange #10 currently set for July 2, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. to July 9, 2021 at 10:30 a.m.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange, Central Justice Center filed by Plaintiff Hui Peng. Motion set for hearing on 7/2/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Dabdoub, Pamela)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE To Plaintiff Hui Peng: Of Initial Standing Order of Judge Josephine L. Staton filed by Defendant Dong Li. (Bowman, Ashley)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE to Plaintiff of 1) Notice of Assignment of United States Judges; and 2) Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program filed by Defendant Dong Li. (Bowman, Ashley)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa)
|
|
Filing 4
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Dong Li, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on February 2, 2021. (Bowman, Ashley)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendant Dong Li, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Hui Peng. (filed in state court 2/13/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Hui Peng, upon Defendant Dong Li served on 2/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Altia Espinoza, Employee, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 2/27/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 4) (esa)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Dong Li, identifying Leoch Battery Corporation; Leoch International Technology, Ltd.. (Bowman, Ashley)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Dong Li. (Bowman, Ashley)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01131891-CU-CO-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-30372748 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Dong Li. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit 3 to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit 4 to Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit 5 to Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit 6 to Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit 7 to Notice of Removal, #8 Exhibit 8 to Notice of Removal, #9 Declaration of Ashley D. Bowman ISO Notice of Removal) (Attorney Ashley D. Bowman added to party Dong Li(pty:dft))(Bowman, Ashley)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hui Peng v. Dong Li | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hui Peng | |
| Represented By: | David Charles Buxbaum |
| Represented By: | Pamela Dabdoub |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dong Li | |
| Represented By: | Ashley D. Bowman |
| Represented By: | Paul S Chan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
