Dwain Lammey v. Durlabh Hospitality, Inc., et al
Dwain Lammey |
Durlabh Hospitality, INC. and Does 1-10 |
8:2021cv00407 |
March 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
John D Early |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Granting Stipulation Staying Further Proceedings and Deadlines (Dkt. #16 ). The Parties shall submit a joint status report within fourteen (14) days after the opinion in the last of the three cases cited herein is issued, which informs the Court how the parties intend to proceed in light of the rulings in the Appeals. The Clerk is ordered to administratively close the action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) |
Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by Defendant Durlabh Hospitality, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order)(Arnold, Matthew) |
Filing 15 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. In light of the Stipulation to Set Aside Default as to Defendant Durlabh Hospitality, Inc. #14 , and given that the Clerk has not yet entered default, the Court sua sponte GRANTS an extension for Defendant to respond to the Complaint on or before 4/12/2021. The Request for Clerk's Entry of Default is DENIED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION to Set Aside Default as to Durlabh Hospitality, Inc. filed by Defendant Durlabh Hospitality, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Arnold, Matthew) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dwain Lammey, upon Defendant Durlabh Hospitality, Inc. served on 2/14/2021, answer due 3/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Laura Chavez, Manager at the motel in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Dwain Lammey, re Notice of Appearance #9 , REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Durlabh Hospitality, Inc. #10 (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Gutierrez, Faythe) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Durlabh Hospitality, Inc., a California Corporation #10 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: No proof of service/waiver of service on file. (twdb) |
Filing 10 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Durlabh Hospitality, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Dwain Lammey. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Gutierrez, Faythe) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Faythe Elizabeth Gutierrez on behalf of Plaintiff Dwain Lammey (Attorney Faythe Elizabeth Gutierrez added to party Dwain Lammey(pty:pla))(Gutierrez, Faythe) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:20-cv-10389 MWF(AGRx) (rn) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (cw) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): 1) The initiating document, Notice of Removal, is filed as Notice (other). It should have been filed under its correct event, Notice of Removal. (2) The Civil Cover Sheet and Notice of Interested Parties are attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed separately under its correct event/relief. You need not respond to this notice unless the Court directs you to do so. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (esa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (esa) |
FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-30885338 for $402 filing fee. (Arnold, Matthew) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Durlabh Hospitality, Inc., filed by plaintiff Dwain Lammey. (filed in state court 1/27/21, submitted as document 2, p. 8) (esa) |
Filing 2 * NOTICE OF REMOVAL * filed as NOTICE (Other) Defendant's Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1441(A) filed by defendant Durlabh Hospitality, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Notice of Party with Financial Interests)(Arnold, Matthew) Modified on 3/9/2021 (esa). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.