James Shayler v. Alexander A. Vizcarra, D.M.D., A Professional Corporation, et al
James Shayler |
Alexander A. Vizcarra, D.M.D., A Professional Corporation, Alexander A. Vizcarra, Does 1-10, inclusive and Annette Go-Vizcarra |
8:2021cv00457 |
March 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Karen E Scott |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice by Judge Cormac J. Carney on Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #15 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cw) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. upon Alexander A. Vizcarra, D.M.D., A Professional Corporation waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/22/2021, answer due 5/21/2021; Annette Go-Vizcarra waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/22/2021, answer due 5/21/2021; Alexander A. Vizcarra waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/22/2021, answer due 5/21/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Eric J. Schindler. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 13 ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. For the foregoing reasons, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. This claim is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff to assert it in state court. The Court retains jurisdiction over Plaintiff's ADA claim. (lom) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Cormac J. Carney: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS UNRUH ACT CLAIM AND RELATED STATE LAW CLAIMS. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ( Show Cause Response due by 3/17/2021.) (twdb) |
Filing 10 ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (cw) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Annette Go-Vizcarra, Alexander A. Vizcarra. (esa) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Alexander A. Vizcarra, D.M.D., A Professional Corporation. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30900815 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.