James Rutherford v. Mari-Ann Lewis et al
| JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual and James Rutherford |
| CURTIS HENRY, an individual, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, SUZETTE REHRER, an individual, MARI-ANN LEWIS, individually and as trustee of the MARIANN LEWIS SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 29, 2004, CHRIS HENRY, an individual, Does 1-10, inclusive, Suzette Rehrer, Curtis Henry, Chris Henry and Mari-Ann Lewis |
| 8:2021cv00475 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice by Judge Cormac J. Carney on Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #23 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cw)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 21
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CORRECTING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND (DKT. #19 #20 ) by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Clerk has reviewed the Proofs of Service of Summons and Complaint filed April 16, 2021; given substituted service, and mailing date of April 9, 2021, the deadline for defendants Curtis and Chris Henry to respond is corrected to May 10, 2021. See C.C.P. 415.20. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Chris Henry served on 4/9/2021, answer due 4/30/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Curtis Henry served on 4/9/2021, answer due 4/30/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Mari-Ann Lewis(as trustee of the Mariann Lewis Separate Property Trust Dated November 29, 2004) served on 4/6/2021, answer due 4/27/2021; Mari-Ann Lewis(individually ) served on 4/6/2021, answer due 4/27/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Rutherfordto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #15 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Rutherford)(Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause as to why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim in the Complaint for similar reasons. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause by March 25, 2021. (iv)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (cw)
|
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Curtis Henry. (car) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Suzette Rehrer. (car) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Chris Henry. (car) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mari-Ann Lewis(as trustee of the Mariann Lewis Separate Property Trust Dated November 29, 2004), Mari-Ann Lewis(individually ). (car) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30904187 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
