James Shayler v. Dudley Properties LLC et al
| JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, and James Shayler |
| DOES 1-10 Inclusive, DUDLEY PROPERTIES LLC, a California limited liability company, Dudley Properties LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv00549 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice by Judge Cormac J. Carney, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #14 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cw)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Dudley Properties LLC answer now due 6/3/2021, filed by Defendant Dudley Properties LLC.(Attorney David E Karlin added to party Dudley Properties LLC(pty:dft))(Karlin, David) |
|
Filing 12
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CORRECTING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND (DKT. #11 ) by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Clerk has reviewed the Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint filed April 27, 2021; given substituted service, and mailing date of April 19, 2021, the deadline for defendant to respond is corrected to May 20, 2021. See C.C.P. 415.20. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Dudley Properties LLC served on 4/19/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Cormac J. Carney: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS UNRUH ACT CLAIM. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ( Show Cause Response due by 3/31/2021.) (twdb)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (cw)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Dudley Properties LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30975509 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
