Cheryl Weimer v. State Farm General Insurance Company et al
| Cheryl Weimer |
| State Farm General Insurance Company and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv00647 |
| April 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan w/ Exhibit A worksheet ; estimated length of trial 4-6 days, filed by Plaintiff Cheryl Weimer.. (Counts, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on April 7, 2021. (Petersen, Clarisse) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 6/18/2021 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Zien M Halwani counsel for Plaintiff Cheryl Weimer. Filed by Plaintiff Cheryl Weimer. (Attorney Zien M Halwani added to party Cheryl Weimer(pty:pla))(Halwani, Zien) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Stephen Dane Counts counsel for Plaintiff Cheryl Weimer. Adding Stephen D. Counts as counsel of record for Cheryl Weimer for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Attorney Stephen D. Counts. (Attorney Stephen Dane Counts added to party Cheryl Weimer(pty:pla))(Counts, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. (Petersen, Clarisse) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, identifying Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Plaintiff Cheryl Weimer. (Petersen, Clarisse) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company identifying State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company as Corporate Parent. (Petersen, Clarisse) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. (Petersen, Clarisse) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01140564-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-31062518 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Clarisse Petersen, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Answer, #4 Declaration Rich Garcia) (Attorney Clarisse Casanova Petersen added to party State Farm General Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Petersen, Clarisse) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, State Farm General Insurance Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Cheryl Weimer. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/26/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
