Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc. et al
Roku, Inc. |
Gemstar Technology (Yangzhou) Co. Ltd., Gemstar Technology (Qinzhou) Co. Ltd., Universal Electronics BV, C.G. Development Ltd., UEI Brasil Controles Remotos Ltda., Universal Electronics, Inc., CG Mxico Remote Controls, S. de R.L. de C.V., Gemstar Technology Yangzhou Co. Ltd. and Gemstar Technology Qinzhou Co. Ltd. |
8:2021cv00658 |
April 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
James V Selna |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINES, ACCEPT SERVICE AND STAY CASE PENDING RESOLUTION OF U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION INVESTIGATION by Judge James V. Selna, re Stipulation to Stay Case #21 : Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend Response Deadlines, Accept Service and Stay Case Pending Resolution of U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-1263, the Stipulation is hereby GRANTED. The deadline for all Defendants to respond to the Complaint shall be extended and consolidated to be on June 9, 2021, to allow for entry of the Court Ordered stay in advance of this response deadline with the expectation that the actual responses will be filed after the eventual lifting of the stay. This case shall be STAYED until the determination of the Commission in ITC Investigation NO. 337-TA-1263 becomes final, including all appeals thereof. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) |
Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Resolution of International Trade Commission Investigation filed by Defendant Universal Electronics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Koppelman, Ryan) |
Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc., upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro, Intake Specialist, CT Corporation, Registered Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. Proof of Service executed by Roku, Inc., upon Defendants C.G. Development Ltd. served on 5/10/2021, answer due 6/1/2021; C.G. Mexico Remote Controls, S. de R.L. de CV served on 5/10/2021, answer due 6/1/2021; Gemstar Technology Qinzhou Co. Ltd. served on 5/10/2021, answer due 6/1/2021; Gemstar Technology Yangzhou Co. Ltd., served on 5/10/2021, answer due 6/1/2021; UEI Brasil Controles Remotos Ltd. served on 5/10/2021, answer due 6/1/2021; Universal Electronics BV, served on 5/10/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Errata to Plaintiff's Proof of Service (Dkt. No. 18) filed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc.. (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc., upon Defendant C.G. Development Ltd. served on 5/28/2021, answer due 6/18/2021; CG Mxico Remote Controls, S. de R.L. de C.V. served on 5/28/2021, answer due 6/18/2021; Gemstar Technology Qinzhou Co. Ltd. served on 5/28/2021, answer due 6/18/2021; Gemstar Technology Yangzhou Co. Ltd. served on 5/28/2021, answer due 6/18/2021; UEI Brasil Controles Remotos Ltda. served on 5/28/2021, answer due 6/18/2021; Universal Electronics BV served on 5/28/2021, answer due 6/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro, Intake Specialist, CT Corporation, Registered Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas W. Davison to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Universal Electronics, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31323693) filed by Defendant Universal Electronics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DC Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit FL Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit VA Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Proposed Order) (Koppelman, Ryan) |
Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Universal Electronics, Inc. answer now due 6/3/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Universal Electronics, Inc..(Koppelman, Ryan) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Katherine Grayce Rubschlager on behalf of Defendant Universal Electronics, Inc. (Attorney Katherine Grayce Rubschlager added to party Universal Electronics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rubschlager, Katherine) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Ryan W Koppelman on behalf of Defendant Universal Electronics, Inc. (Attorney Ryan W Koppelman added to party Universal Electronics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Koppelman, Ryan) |
Filing 13 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 6/28/2021 at 11:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 6/21/2021. (lb) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc., upon Defendant Universal Electronics, Inc. served on 4/13/2021, answer due 5/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro, Intake Specialist, CT Corporation, Registered Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 10 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:18-cv-01580 JVS (ADSx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick and Judge Josephine L. Staton to Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-00658 JVS (ADSx). Signed by Judge James V. Selna (esa) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants C.G. Development Ltd., CG Mxico Remote Controls, S. de R.L. de C.V., Gemstar Technology Qinzhou Co. Ltd., Gemstar Technology Yangzhou Co. Ltd., UEI Brasil Controles Remotos Ltda., Universal Electronics BV, Universal Electronics, Inc. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc.. (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Roku, Inc.. (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc.. Related Case(s): 8:18-cv-01580; 8:20-cv-00701; 8:20-cv-00696; 8:20-cv-00700; 8:20-cv-00704 (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc., (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc.. (Baker, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31076791 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Roku, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H) (Attorney Jonathan D Baker added to party Roku, Inc.(pty:pla))(Baker, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.