Tito Vasquez v. Distractions Lounge et al
| Adam Ghadiri and Tito Vasquez |
| Distractions Inc., Distractions Lounge and MBSB Legacy LP |
| 8:2021cv00695 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT, REMOVING CASE FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD, AND FILING OF DISMISSAL by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On 6/4/2021, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement (Doc. #14 ), indicating that the case has fully settled. Based thereon, the Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case stayed and that this action is removed from the Courts active caseload. The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal no later than 7/4/2021. Until the Dismissal Date, the Court retains full jurisdiction over this action. All outstanding Orders to Show Cause are discharged. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Tito Vasquez. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MBSB Legacy LP answer now due 6/10/2021; Distractions Lounge answer now due 6/10/2021, filed by Defendants MBSB Legacy LP; Distractions Lounge.(Attorney Rex T Reeves added to party Distractions Lounge(pty:dft), Attorney Rex T Reeves added to party MBSB Legacy LP(pty:dft))(Reeves, Rex) |
| Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (mku) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Case was opened with the wrong plaintiff's name of Adam Ghadiri. The docket has been corrected to match the Plaintiff on the complaint which is Tito Vasquez. (car) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Distractions Inc. (car) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant MBSB Legacy LP. (car) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Distractions Lounge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri, identifying Distractions Lounge; Distractions Inc.; MBSB Legacy LP;. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31119909 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Attorney Joseph Bakhos added to party Adam Ghadiri(pty:pla))(Bakhos, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
