Philip Bolden et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Advanced Marketing & Distribution, Inc., Phillip Bolden, Advanced Marketing and Distribution, Inc. and Philip Bolden
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2021cv00713
Filed: April 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Pascal, Logan)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #13 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. In accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Documents, it is hereby ORDERED that the document is accepted as filed. However, counsel must consult the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #14 and file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than **May 27, 2021.** Failure to do so may result in the Motion being STRICKEN. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiffs Advanced Marketing and Distribution, Inc., Philip Bolden #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiffs Advanced Marketing and Distribution, Inc., Philip Bolden. Motion set for hearing on 10/8/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration) (Attorney Logan Garrett Pascal added to party Advanced Marketing and Distribution, Inc. (pty:pla), Attorney Logan Garrett Pascal added to party Philip Bolden(pty:pla)) (Pascal, Logan)
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 7/2/2021 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.(Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-00713-JLS-ADS. (rrp)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 . Document # 6 Due to clerical error. The docket clerk docketed the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program with wrong spelling of defendant named Phillip Bolden. The correct spelling defendant name is Philip Bolden. (ghap) Modified on 4/20/2021 (ghap).
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 4/20/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 7] NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) Modified on 4/20/2021 (ghap).
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC., filed by plaintiffs Phillip Bolden, Advanced Marketing and Distribution, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/12/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, identifying Daimler North America Corporation. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC identifying Daimler North America Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-0118920 Receipt No: ACACDC-31133857 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Philip Bolden et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Represented By: Soheyl Tahsildoost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Marketing & Distribution, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Bolden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Marketing and Distribution, Inc.
Represented By: David N Barry
Represented By: Logan Garrett Pascal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philip Bolden
Represented By: David N Barry
Represented By: Logan Garrett Pascal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?