Siamak Lotfisafiabady v. Merrick Garland, et al
| Siamak Lotfisafiabady |
| Doe 1, Officer L. Le, Trung Vo, Merrick Garland, Tracy Renaud and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 8:2021cv00828 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. § 1447 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. 1447(b) #30 by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Each side shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es)
|
| Filing 30 STIPULATION to Remand Case to US Agency filed by Defendants Doe 1, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Trung Vo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(La Scala, Paul) |
| Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Paul B La Scala counsel for Defendants Doe 1, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Trung Vo. Adding Paul B. La Scala as counsel of record for Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Trung Vo, Doe 1 for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Trung Vo, Doe 1. (Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party Doe 1(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party Merrick Garland(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party Tracy Renaud(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party Trung Vo(pty:dft))(La Scala, Paul) |
| Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Amended POS (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Amended POS (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Amended POS (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Amended POS (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Amended POS (Attachments: #1 Supplement Service on AUSA's office)(Holt, Matthew) |
|
Filing 23
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): OSC Why Proof of Service Declarations Should Not Be Amended by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, The Court may permit amendment of POS declarations to show proper service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(1)(3). Plaintiff, therefore, is ordered to show cause in writing on or before June 21, 2021, why the POS declarations at Dkt. 18-22 should not be amended. Alternatively, Plaintiff can discharge this OSC by filing amended POS declarations that address the deficiencies identified herein and comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. (et)
|
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Tracy Renaud served on 5/17/2021, answer due 7/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Service on AUSA's office)(Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA, #12 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA, #16 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA, #14 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA, #15 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA, #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Caption of document is incomplete/incorrect. Case number is incorrect or missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Doe 1 served on 5/17/2021, answer due 7/16/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Trung Vo served on 5/17/2021, answer due 7/16/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Tracy Renaud served on 5/18/2021, answer due 7/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 5/17/2021, answer due 7/16/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, upon Defendant Merrick Garland served on 5/17/2021, answer due 7/16/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk - via certified mail. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Service on AUSA's office)(Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Doe 1. (es) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request #7 , Summons Issued #9 filed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant(s) Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Trung Vo. (es) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady, identifying None. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady. (Holt, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31235562 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Siamak Lotfisafiabady. (Attorney Matthew Gabriel Holt added to party Siamak Lotfisafiabady(pty:pla))(Holt, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
