The Litebook Company Ltd. v. TCL Corporation et al
The Litebook Company Ltd. |
TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd., TCT Mobile International Limited, TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc., TCT Mobile Worldwide Limited and TCL Corporation |
8:2021cv01011 |
June 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Douglas F McCormick |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. § 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jennifer Tatum Lee. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney John M. Shumaker. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Cabrach J. Connor. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
Filing 11 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd., identifying The Litebook Company Ltd., and Progressive Lighting and Radiometrics LLC Connor Kudlac Lee PLLC,. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31428690 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff The Litebook Company Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Ryan E Hatch added to party The Litebook Company Ltd.(pty:pla))(Hatch, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.