Kesean Harvey Davis v. Khalil M. Ibrahim et al
| Mr. KESEAN HARVEY DAVIS and Kesean Harvey Davis |
| Mr. KHALIL M IBRAHIM, Mr. Arthur Villa, The City of Huntington Beach, Khalil M. Ibrahim, Arthur Villa and Mathew McAllister |
| 8:2021cv01032 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V Selna |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Khalil M. Ibrahim, Mathew McAllister, The City of Huntington Beach, Arthur Villa. (es) |
| Filing 22 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 21 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 20 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 19 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
Filing 18
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 9/20/2021 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 9/13/2021. (lb)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #13 , Summons Request #16 , Summons Request #15 , Summons Request #14 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (es) |
| Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #7 , Summons Request #9 , Summons Request #10 , Summons Request #8 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (es) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #6 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kesean Harvey Davis. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying Kesean Davis, Khalil M. Ibrahim, Arthur Villa, Mathew McAllister and the City of Huntington Beach. (Perry, Robin) |
| Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. The Civil Cover Sheet should have been filed under a separate event, not as an attachment to the complaint. Please utilize CM/ECF resources such as the search tool to locate the appropriate events for filing. No further action is required unless directed by the Court. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31450506 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff KESEAN HARVEY DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Robin D Perry added to party KESEAN HARVEY DAVIS(pty:pla))(Perry, Robin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
