Brian Cross v. Kenneth Whelan et al
Brian Cross |
Does 1 to 10, inclusive, Kenneth Whelan and Kathy Whelan |
8:2021cv01083 |
June 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Josephine L Staton |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court - Justice Center. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court - Justice Center. Case number: 30-02021-01196267-CU-UD-CJC. (jp) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
Filing 13 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Josephine L. Staton that this matter be REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 12 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Josephine L. Staton that this matter be REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 , #3 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for the following reasons: (1) District Court lacks jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby REMANDED to State Court. (jp) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Cross, identifying Brian Cross. (Andrews, R) |
Filing 8 EX-PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND THIS CASE TO STATE COURT filed as] EX PARTE APPLICATION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Brian Cross. (Andrews, R) Modified on 6/25/2021 (lom). |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Brian Cross. Motion set for hearing on 12/3/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attorney R Scott Andrews added to party Brian Cross(pty:pla)) (Andrews, R) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Kathy Whelan, Kenneth Whelan. (ghap) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by defendant Kenneth Whelan. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by defendant Kathy Whelan. (ghap) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court State of CA County of Orange, case number 30-2021-01196267-CU-UD-CJC with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Karen E Scott., filed by Defendants Kathy Whelan, Kenneth Whelan. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.