Blaine Patriquin et al v. IMCD US, LLC et al
| NICOLLE PERALES and BLAINE PATRIQUIN |
| E.T. HORN COMPANY, DOES 1 through 50, IMCD US, LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv01127 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Joint Stipulation to Stay Case and Toll Statute of Limitations #10 . The Parties shall promptly notify the Court if they reach a settlement. The Court hereby administratively closes this case pending mediation. Counsel may have the case re-opened upon filing of an application or request. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Mediation and Toll Statute of Limitations on Certain Claims filed by Defendants E.T. Horn Company, IMCD US, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Stay Case and Toll Statute of Limitations)(Dillion, Heather) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants E.T. Horn Company, IMCD US, LLC, served on June 29, 2021. (Dillion, Heather) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa) |
| COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendants IMCD US, LLC. and E.T. Horn Company (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 3)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, E.T. Horn Company, IMCD US, LLC, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiffs Nicolle Perales, Blaine Patriquin. (filed in state court 4/23/21, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants DOES 1 through 50, E.T. HORN COMPANY, IMCD US, LLC. Related Case(s): None (Dillion, Heather) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, identifying Blaine Patriquin, Nicolle Perales, IMCD US, LLC, E.T. Horn Company (erroneously sued as a purported separate entity), and IMCD Holdings US, Inc.. (Attorney Heather Brittany Dillion added to party DOES 1 through 50(pty:dft))(Dillion, Heather) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants DOES 1 through 50, E.T. HORN COMPANY, IMCD US, LLC identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Dillion, Heather) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants DOES 1 through 50, E.T. HORN COMPANY, IMCD US, LLC. (Dillion, Heather) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01197131-CU-OE-CXC Receipt No: ACACDC-31541753 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants IMCD US, LLC, E.T. HORN COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Heather B. Dillion, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint and Supporting Documents, #3 Exhibit B - Answer, #4 Exhibit C - Motion for Order Granting Final Approval of Class Settlement, #5 Declaration Thomas Van Valkenburgh, #6 Exhibit A - IMCD Application to Register a Foreign LLC, #7 Exhibit B - Agreement and Plan of Merger) (Attorney Heather Brittany Dillion added to party E.T. HORN COMPANY(pty:dft), Attorney Heather Brittany Dillion added to party IMCD US, LLC(pty:dft))(Dillion, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
