Pandora Marketing, LLC v. Sentinel Insurance Company Limited
| Pandora Marketing, LLC |
| Sentinel Insurance Company Limited |
| Indian Harbor Insurance Company |
| 8:2021cv01137 |
| June 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| James V Selna |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 36
ORDER GRANTING REQUESTS FOR DISMISSAL by Judge James V. Selna, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #35 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (a) pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) (A)(ii), Pandora's claims against Sentinel in the captioned matter be, and hereby are, dismissed without prejudice; (b) pursuant to FRCP 41(c), Sentinel's counterclaims against Pandora in the captioned matter be, and hereby are, dismissed without prejudice; (c) pursuant to FRCP 41(c), Sentinel's third party complaint in the captioned matter solely as against Indian Harbor be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice; (d) Sentinel's third party complaint in the captioned matter as against all third party defendants other than Indian Harbor be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice; and (e) no award of attorneys' fees or costs or expert fees or costs is made in favor of any of the Parties in connection with the captioned matter.Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
|
| Filing 35 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41 filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC.(Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 33 ANSWER to Third Party Complaint #24 filed by Third-Party Defendant Indian Harbor Insurance Company.(Attorney Matthew Clark Lovell added to party Indian Harbor Insurance Company(pty:3pd))(Lovell, Matthew) |
|
Filing 32
MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE SCHEDULING DATES by Judge James V. Selna: The Court has read and considered the parties Rule 26(f) Report and sets the following dates: Jury Trial February 14, 2023 at 8:30 a.m.; File Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by February 7, 2023; Final PreTrial Conference January 30, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.; File PreTrial Documents not later than January 24, 2023; File motions in limine not later than January 2, 2023; Discovery Cut-off October 18, 2022; Expert Discovery Cut-off December 15, 2022; Initial disclosure of Experts not later than October 18, 2022; Rebuttal disclosure of Experts not later than November 15, 2022; Law and Motion Cut-off December 19, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. Motions to be filed and served not later than November 21, 2022. Counsel inform the Court in the Rule 26f report that their selection for a settlement procedure pursuant to Local Rule 16-15 is ADR No. 3, private mediation. The Court orders that any settlement discussions shall be completed not later than December 4, 2022. Counsel shall file a Joint Report of the parties regarding outcome of settlement discussions, the likelihood of possible further discussions and any help the Court may provide with regard to settlement negotiations not later than seven (7) days after the settlement conference. The Scheduling Conference set for January 24, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED. (bm)
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL SETTING DATES; PREPARATION FOR TRIAL; AND GOVERNING ATTORNEY AND PARTY CONDUCT AT TRIAL before Judge James V. Selna. (See Document for Details and Deadlines) (lb)
|
| Filing 30 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Counter Defendant Pandora Marketing, LLC, Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC, Third Party Plaintiffs Sentinel Insurance Company Limited, Sentinel Insurance Company Limited.. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE filed by Counter Defendant Pandora Marketing, LLC, Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLCto Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, #23 (Schulz, Harry) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge James V. Selna, re Stipulation to Continue, #22 the Court having considered the Second Stipulation to Continue, hereby ORDERS that: (1) The Scheduling Conference, currently set in this matter for December 6, 2021 at 10:30 a.m., be continued to January 24, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. (es)
|
| Filing 27 21 DAY Summons Issued re Third Party Complaint #24 as to Third-party Defendant Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (es) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Third-Party Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company Limited(a Connecticut corporation), identifying Sentinel Insurance Company, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.,, Pandora Marketing, LLC, Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (Ellison, Michael) |
| Filing 25 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Third Party Complaint #24 filed by Third-Party Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company Limited(a Connecticut corporation). (Ellison, Michael) |
| Filing 24 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Third-Party Defendant Indian Harbor Insurance Company ; Jury Demand, filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company Limited.(Ellison, Michael) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Indian Harbor Insurance Company, COUNTERCLAIM against Pandora Marketing, LLC filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company Limited.(Ellison, Michael) |
| Filing 22 Second STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from December 6, 2021 to January 24, 2022 Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #14 filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ellison, Michael) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER RE FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge James V. Selna, the Court, hereby ORDERS that: (1) Sentinel's time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Pandora's initial Complaint for Breach of Contract and Bad Faith in the above-captioned action shall be extended by an additional twenty-one (21) days, making Sentinel's response now due on or before November 17, 2021; and, (2) The Scheduling Conference, currently set in this matter for November 8, 2021 at 10:30 a.m., is continued to December 6, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. The Joint Rule 26f Report with the attached Courts Exhibit A is due by November 29, 2021. Granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #20 (es)
|
| Filing 20 Fourth STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ellison, Michael) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER RE: THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #18 by Judge James V. Selna. Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company Limited time within which to answer or otherwise respond shall be extended by an additional thirty (30) days, now due on or before 10/27/2021. The Scheduling Conference in this matter, currently set for October 4, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. is continued to November 8, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. Counsel shall filed the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by November 1, 2021. (es)
|
| Filing 18 Third STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 27, 2021 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 17 [IN CHAMBERS] SCHEDULING NOTICE: Due to inadvertence, the Scheduling Conference in this matter was set for 9/30/2021 at 10:30 am. On the Court's own motion the Scheduling Conference is re-set for 10/4/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 9/27/2021. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 16
ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #15 , by Judge James V. Selna. Sentinel's time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Pandora's initial Complaint shall be extended by an additional thirty (30) days, making Sentinel's response now due on or before September 27, 2021. (es)
|
| Filing 15 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ellison, Michael) |
|
Filing 14
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 9/30/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 9/23/2021. (dca)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sentinel Insurance Company Limited answer now due 8/27/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company Limited.(Attorney Michael W Ellison added to party Sentinel Insurance Company Limited(pty:dft))(Ellison, Michael) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Dale S. Fischer, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:20-cv-05486-DSF-(ADSx). (dve)
|
| Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company Limited. (es) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #2 filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #2 filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC, identifying 1. Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited 2. Pandora Marketing, LLC 3. Pandora Servicing, LLC 4. VCF Enterprises, LLC 5. William Wilson 6. Rich Folk 7. Kenneth Eddy. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC. Related Case(s): 6:19-cv-01908-WWB-EJK; 1:20-cv-24681-RNS; 2:20-cv-05486-DSF-ADS (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31556473 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Pandora Marketing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Complaint) (Attorney Harry J Schulz, III added to party Pandora Marketing, LLC(pty:pla))(Schulz, Harry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
