Charles Davis et al v. ABM Industries Inc. et al
| Charles Davis, Jonathan Nabago, Mohamed Bholat, Byron Williams, Chiragh Hussain and Reginald Johnson |
| United Service Workers West SEIU Local 1877 and Does I through X inclusive |
| ABM Industries, Inc. |
| 8:2021cv01189 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Michael R. Wilner. New Case Number 2:21-cv-05623 ODW (MRWx). (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant ABM Industries, Inc., identifying ABM Aviation, Inc.. (Wersching, Eric) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Removal Receipt No: ACACDC-31605677 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant ABM Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Eric J. Wersching, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Eric J Wersching added to party ABM Industries, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Wersching, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
