Arturo Michael Amezcua v. Quicken Loans LLC
| Arturo Michael Amezcua and Arturo M Amezcua |
| Quicken Loans LLC |
| 8:2021cv01231 |
| July 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Karen E Scott |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney DENYING Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fee #2 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. [MD JS-6, Case Terminated. ] (et)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Arturo Michael Amezcua. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Arturo Michael Amezcua against Defendant Quicken Loans LLC. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
