Sanrio Company, Ltd. et al v. Scion Global Production Inc. et al
| Sanrio Company, Ltd. and Sanrio, Inc. |
| Scion Global Production Inc. doing business as FINEX, Rick Pan and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv01259 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER Granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #15 , by Judge David O. Carter. Defendants Rick Pan answer due 10/8/2021; Scion Global Production Inc. answer due 10/8/2021. (twdb)
|
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Amended Complaint/Petition #14 filed by Plaintiffs Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 14 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiffs Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc.(Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc., upon Defendant Scion Global Production Inc. served on 8/6/2021, answer due 8/27/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc., upon Defendant Rick Pan served on 8/6/2021, answer due 8/27/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Rick Pan, Scion Global Production Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Defendant Rick Pan) (lh) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc.. (Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc.. (Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request (Pan))(Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc., identifying SANRIO COMPANY, LTD.; SANRIO, INC.; SCION GLOBAL PRODUCTION INC. D/B/A FINEX; RICK PAN. (Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc.. (Wang, Annie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31695175 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiffs Sanrio Company, Ltd., Sanrio, Inc.. (Attorney Annie S Wang added to party Sanrio Company, Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney Annie S Wang added to party Sanrio, Inc.(pty:pla))(Wang, Annie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
