Alma Uribe v. Coloplast Corporation
Alma Uribe |
Coloplast Corporation |
8:2021cv01358 |
August 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
John D Early |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Coloplast Corporation identifying Coloplast A/S as Corporate Parent. (Steimle, William) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Coloplast Corporation.(Attorney William Edward Steimle added to party Coloplast Corporation(pty:dft))(Steimle, William) |
Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alma Uribe, upon Defendant Coloplast Corporation served on 8/18/2021, answer due 9/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Baughman, Laura) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney All Plaintiffs, (Baughman, Laura) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Coloplast Corporation. (esa) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (esa) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Alma Uribe. (Baughman, Laura) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alma Uribe. (Baughman, Laura) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31827303 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Alma Uribe. (Attorney Laura J Baughman added to party Alma Uribe(pty:pla))(Baughman, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alma Uribe v. Coloplast Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alma Uribe | |
Represented By: | Laura J Baughman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Coloplast Corporation | |
Represented By: | Donald F Zimmer, Jr |
Represented By: | William Edward Steimle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.