Buthaina Tafas et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Buthaina Tafas, Raeed Jarjour, Majd Jarjour and Mouna Jarjour |
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Los Angeles Asylum Office, David Radel, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Jennifer Higgins, Matthew D. Emrich and Christopher A. Wray |
8:2021cv01364 |
August 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Josephine L Staton |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION #34 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the instant action shall be stayed until 4/1/2022. (jp) |
Filing 34 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION filed by Defendants Matthew D. Emrich, Jennifer Higgins, Los Angeles Asylum Office, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, Tracy Renaud, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Christopher A. Wray. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Keith M Staub added to party Matthew D. Emrich(pty:dft), Attorney Keith M Staub added to party Jennifer Higgins(pty:dft), Attorney Keith M Staub added to party Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft), Attorney Keith M Staub added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Keith M Staub added to party David Radel(pty:dft), Attorney Keith M Staub added to party Tracy Renaud(pty:dft), Attorney Keith M Staub added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft), Attorney Keith M Staub added to party United States Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney Keith M Staub added to party Christopher A. Wray(pty:dft))(Staub, Keith) |
Filing 33 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant Christopher A. Wray served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 32 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant Tracy Renaud served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 30 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant David Radel served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant Los Angeles Asylum Office served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant Jennifer Higgins served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant Matthew D. Emrich served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Majd Jarjour, Raeed Jarjour, Mouna Jarjour, Buthaina Tafas, upon Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
Filing 24 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.